Getting My h4831sc load data To Work
Getting My h4831sc load data To Work
Blog Article
Your session is about to timeout because of inactivity. Click on OK to extend your time and energy for an additional 0 minutes.
They have performed identically for me. Like Everybody else I rushed to get the more recent SC Variation but have now switched back. Preferably you'd like about a hundred% loading density. When you've got ample scenario potential for the H4831(extensive) you will be likely improved off.
This is amongst the most significant factors reloaders are admonished to work with new data only; and to start out very low when you will get a whole new wide range of powder. You don't truly know (Unless of course the company informs you so) that the new wide range of powder was even manufactured at precisely the same factory since the powder you got a several years in the past.
Indeed you could. They can be the exact same correct powder but the SC powder is simply cut shorter so it meters better.
In any case, I knew the two lbs . of H4831SC used the identical data, but I did not know whether there was nearly anything distinctive among a pound of powder labeled "Excessive" and a person not so labeled. A call to Hodgdon verified which they have been in fact similar and the only real big difference was The brand around the label.
Any load data to support that? My initial considered is it's actually not intending to melt away many of the way and velocities will be gradual and far and wide. Is likely to be a good fireworks Show!
I'm applying it using a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 wasn't as exact. RL22 did nicely but I used to be a little bit concerned about temp balance. I feel I am at 72 grains and acquire all over 2850ish fps
excaliber stated: I've discovered the precise opposite for being accurate in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a much faster and Similarly correct powder in my 300 Win Mag.
I could stack em in one hole but I wasn’t pleased with the velocity. After months, I received Fortunate and caught some H1000 on the net not to mention compensated a bit added. The h4831 vs h4831sc quite future week at a gun demonstrate a man experienced an entire scenario of H1000 for $forty for every 1lb. I ignore how much, but Using the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a gentle load.
Why would I point out this? Just what is my issue? I'm unsure that there's a actual legitimate stage besides what's common with most hasn't been well-known with me in the slightest degree in these situations. Do I just Use a powder jinx or something? Simply to teach you how insane I really am, tomorrow I am variety screening a good friends new .
Despite the similarity in h4831sc load data nomenclature, they're absolutely distinctive powders, with IMR 4831 being substantially quicker as opposed to Hodgdon variants. Really don't address them as the same powder, h4831sc since they most certainly aren't.
Right after examining this information (and a lot of Some others, but this one particular is among the most data driven with multiple accredited shooters) I have stopped worrying about touching or being inside of a magical length from your lands, and started loading where by I could enhance numerous aspects of a load. Just my .02, ideally you will get something to operate for ya.
Chances are you'll both: 1) Proceed and have the items listed down below quickly faraway from your searching cart:
The container did not provide the "Excessive" brand on it. A coworker and I then swapped some powder, And that i wound up with A different pound of H4831SC, this a single with the "Serious" emblem on it.